4 tips to mentally and emotionally Dealing With DUI

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Getting arrested for DUI is never easy. You will possibly have to deal with a suspended license, a large fine, mandatory community service and probation. Along with the legal ramifications of a DUI, the guilt, embarrassment and worry you feel after a DUI or DWI related arrest can overtake your life for days, weeks or even months.

Although there are various legal steps to take when dealing with a DUI, it is very important to put your mental and emotional health near the top of your priority list. The mental anguish you feel is very real, and should be tended to. Here are four tips for mentally and emotionally dealing with a DUI.

1. Talk to your lawyer.
In situations like these, everybody wants to know what is in store. If you are like me, knowing what you can expect even if you don't like it is far better than being taken off guard down the road. For this reason, I suggest talking to your lawyer after the hearing. A reputable, trusted DUI lawyer will have been through this process countless times and will be able to tell you what you can expect. I still remember how much talking to my Seattle DUI lawyer personally put me at ease. Talking to my Seattle DUI attorney allowed me to know the facts and put a plan together. Having a plan of attack for future issues makes them much easier to deal with.

2. Discuss the matter with friends and family.
A DUI is something that you are going to have to deal with on a personal, internal level. However, it is something that should be discussed with close family and friends. If you are convicted of a DUI, there are going to be parts of your life that change. Your probation isn't going to allow you to go to bars or nightclubs. You are also likely to have driving restrictions. Talking to your friends and family about your situation can alleviate some of the emotional weight of a DUI. Your friends and family will support you and help you through this tough time.

3. Talk to an alcohol abuse support group.
Not everyone who gets a DUI is an alcoholic. Your DUI could have been a result of a lapse of judgment or a one time night of uncharacteristic binge drinking. Regardless, there are many positive benefits of attending alcohol abuse support group meetings. At these meetings, you will be surrounded by people who are either currently in your situation or have been in your situation. Knowing that you aren't singled out in a DUI is very important; it eases your embarrassment and guilt. Listening and speaking at a support group will improve your mental and emotional health, allowing you to get on with your life.

4. Accept responsibility and learn from your mistake.
Perhaps the biggest suggestion I can offer for getting on with your life after a DUI arrest is accepting responsibility. Don't blame other people. Do not complain to the police to be tough with her, or the court to set an example for you. Take responsibility for their actions and mistakes. Be honest with yourself, you put everything in perspective and really move forward.

Turow Scott - author biography

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Scott Turow was born on April 12, 1949 in Chicago, Illinois. After graduating from New Trier High School, he attended Amherst College where he graduated in 1970. He won a scholarship to attend Stanford College Writing Center where he graduated in 1975. He attended Harvard Law School from 1975 to 1978.

Scott says that he knew he wanted to be a writer from the time he was 17 years old. He said he decided to write and practice law when he realized that he wasn't going to support himself as a writer. During his first year at Harvard, he was commissioned to write a book about his experiences as a first year law student. The outcome is "One L", published in 1977.

Scott Turow married Annette, a painter in 1971. They have three children, but divorced in 2008. From 1978 to 1986, Scott was an Assistant United States Attorney in Chicago where he prosecuted several high profile cases.

Besides his books, Scott has published many articles including reviews and a treatise on why he does not believe in the death penalty. In 2003 his book, "Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflection on Dealing with the Death Penalty", was published.

Scott Turow is a partner in a large national law firm, Sonnenshein, Nath and Rosenthal. He has worked pro bono cases especially for those wrongfully convicted, as in the case of Alejandro Hernandez. Mr. Hernandez was accused and convicted of the murder of a young girl. He spent 11 years on death row before Mr. Turow won his release in 1996. Scott says that at one time he was death penalty agnostic, but no more.

Scott Turow was appointed, by then Governor Ryan, to the Commission of Capital Punishment and Reform. He is a trustee at Amherst College and was the Author's Guild for a year and still serves on the board of directors. He also served on the United States Senate Nominations Commission.
Scott has practiced law part time since 1986. He says he writes in the morning and becomes a lawyer in the afternoon. He claims that he still has billable hours every day.

Most of Scott Turow's books are legal thrillers. An exemption is "Ordinary Heroes." Scott says that "Ordinary Heroes" is a book that he had wanted to write since he was 17 years old. This book centers on fathers and sons, WWII and hidden pasts. Scott says his own family fabricated their pasts.
So far three of Scott Turow's books have been made into movies: Presumed Innocent in 1990, The The burden of proof in 1992, and reversible error in the year 2004.

Times Magazine, Scott Turow once considered a "singer Age of conflict". Los Angeles Times said: "Nobody writes best mystery novel, the anticipation of Scott Turow.

Scott Turow's novels

Presumed Innocent (1987)
The burden of proof (1990)
Pleaded guilty (1993)
Laws of Our Fathers (1996)
Body (1999)
Reversible Errors (2002)
Ordinary Heroes (2005)
Restriction(2006)

Tries:
L (1977)
Ultimate punishment: a reflection layer on the treatment of the death penalty (2003)

Life is a criminal lawyer

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Life as a criminal defense lawyer is not easy when your job is basically to help those who are arrested of a crime. While some of the clients you meet are innocent, many of them are guilty and have had previous run-ins with the law.

Since the law dictates that everyone is innocent until proven guilty and you decided to specialize in this field, you have to defend this person by putting up the best defense there is available.

There are various strategies you can use to get your client off. You can plead insanity or claim that someone else did the crime. If your client has something to offer, you can make a deal with the district attorney in exchange for the client being granted immunity.

But before you decide what cards to play, you have to talk to your client. If this person is in jail, you have to go there and ask what happened. You should already discuss whether to enter a guilty or not guilty plea because your client will be arraigned shortly.

When a trial date has been set, you can get a copy of the documents of the case from the district attorney's office because by law, both sides are supposed to view everything from the police reports to the evidence.

You will also get a copy of the people the prosecution will be calling to the witness stand as they too will also be aware of that so there will be no surprises during trial.

When it is your turn to cross examine the witness, you should use whatever is available to cast doubt on their testimony because this is the only way that the jury may be convinced that your client is not capable of doing the crime. Using expert witnesses of your own is also helpful since they can dispute the claims of the other camp.

Before the jury will reach its verdict, you will have one last chance to state your client's innocence when you are given the opportunity for your closing argument. When it is all over, you just have to wait for the decision of the court to take the next course of action.

Your client's not guilty verdict means your job is done and you can move on and work with another client. A guilty verdict means you have to stay on as counsel for this individual and appeal the jury's decision to a higher court so you can perhaps get a reversal.

The best way to win an appeal is to determine if there is something in the trial that shouldn't have happened or was overlooked. These technicalities are better known as constitutional protections. For instance, the client's confession was taken without the presence of a lawyer so whatever they said is inadmissible in court. The same goes if a search was done without a warrant.

There are many examples which you can use. You may even cite a case with similar circumstances because this serves as precedence to the one you are working on.

The life of a criminal defense lawyer is challenging no matter how many times you have been in the courtroom. Because you get to work with different clients every time someone is innocent, can not be accused of this crime, since the principle of double criminality.

Tort law changes and their impact on society

Image : http://www.flickr.com

A tort is a wrongful act, damage, or injury that is done willfully, negligently, or in situations that involve strict liability. However, a Tort does not involve contract breach in which a civil lawsuit might be initiated. Recently, we have seen supporters of the legal system in this country trying to connect litigation for torts with a number of things such as pushing medical professionals out of business all the way to closing down public parks.

Most of these supporters agree that the current tort system in this country is putting a huge strain on the economy. This issue has become so serious that even President Bush is pushing for tort law change in which our economic growth would be improved, particularly through the creation of new jobs. While tort litigation is not going anywhere and it is valuable in some cases, the current law is forcing liability insurance to outrageous levels in many sectors.

For instance, because of the high cost of tort litigation, we see wages decreasing, corporate profits being greatly affected, productivity going down, and even research and development being discouraged. The bottom line is that the rising cost of torts is having a dynamic impact on our society. Many now argue that by changing the current tort system, we would have a chance of boosting the economy while others feel a new tort system would actually have the opposite effect in discouraging the development of new jobs.

Let us look at how the current tort system plays. A mother and child decide to spend a sunny afternoon at the local community swimming pool. While the child is jumping off the side of the pool into the water, the mother gets up to go inside for something to drink. At this same time, the on-duty lifeguard is working in another area of the pool. The child jumps into the shallow end, hits his head on the bottom of the pool, and becomes paralyzed. Although the mother may not win a lawsuit in court, her claim of negligence toward the lifeguard would consume legal fees in his/her defense.

Now, apply the current tort laws with every aspect of our society, and you can see how significant the problem is. For instance, the woman who spilled hot coffee in her lap after buying it from McDonald’s was actually awarded money. Her claim in the lawsuit was that the coffee was too hot and that no warning was provided, not that she was at fault for spilling it. We see so many instances in which the current tort laws affect the economy of this society.

Keep in mind that the tort system does offer benefits. For instance, unsafe products, inappropriate practices, respectful resolution, are all good things. However, when you look at the current tort laws and weigh pros and cons, some serious issues come to light. Changing this law is something being scrutinized to determine if in fact a new tort system would boost the economy while still provide protection needed in cases of unlawful damage or injury.

Using the services of legal aid

Image : http://www.flickr.com

I have worked in the human services field for years and I am well aware of the fact that most people don't know that there are legal aid services available. When people need legal advice they can turn to a variety of legal aid services. Most of the states in the US offer legal aid services to people who cannot afford to pay for lawyers. In each state there is a different division of legal aid services, they may be located by regions, counties or cities. It is good to know that legal aid services include many different services.

Usually when you need to have an attorney answer a specific question over the phone, you don't have to pay for their services. However, you should be very careful and absolutely sure that you are speaking with the right guy. For example, if you need a legal advice about a crime you shouldn't talk to a real estate attorney and in case you need information about taxes a criminal attorney won't help you. It is vital to know that each area of legal service is divided into areas of expertise.

In case talking over the phone is not good enough, then you will have to hire the attorney to help you solve your case. This is when you can turn to the legal aid services in your state. You can get legal advice and representation at a discounted price or sometimes completely free of charge if you are not able to pay anything. There are states which provide public defenders for criminal cases. Sometimes these services are divided into separate offices. In some states legal aid services handles only civil matters and family court cases. For instance, the legal aid service in my city offers help for divorces for women who are victims of domestic violence. The local office also protects the civil rights of vulnerable adults.

Maybe you are wondering how legal aid services can be free of charge. This is possible when the attorneys working on the case do the work pro bono which means that they donate their time to represent the person in court. Sometimes local or state governments hire attorneys to provide services to individuals in the community. It is great that there are legal aid services because this is the only chance that the poor will be able to protect their rights and will get legal advice. However, when you turn to the local legal aid services office you should be ready for long waiting as the attorneys working there have very heavy case loads.

Before any attorney in such offices provide any legal services you provide your financial information in advance to ensure you qualify for legal aid. There is a threshold of income to different states. If you go to legal aid office, will also be informed that they can do things that you need legal representation or not.

Avoid a conviction - that the leak?

Image : http://www.flickr.com

Sometimes the criminal justice system comes up with a good compromise between justice and mercy. This doesn't happen often, but when a defendant who has no prior criminal record and the offense is not considered serious, a compromise is sometimes reached that allow this person to move past one incident without acquiring a criminal record.

One such compromise is called a "diversion." A diversion means a case is "diverted" out of the criminal justice system for a period of time (usually one year), during which time the defendant must undergo treatment, counseling, make restitution to the persons harmed or perform community service.

If the defendant meets these conditions, pays all fines and court costs, and does not get into any additional trouble with the law during this time period, the case is dropped and this person does not have a criminal record.

On the surface a diversion sounds good, but in my experience it can be a two-edged sword. Usually, defendants must plead guilty in order to be considered for a diversion. So if, during the time period of the diversion, they fail to comply 100% with the terms of their diversion, or if they get into any other trouble, the courts will automatically find them guilty based on their guilty plea.

This last point is where I have seen many defendants get tripped up. A single alcohol-related incident, a domestic complaint or even the accusation of a crime may be all it takes for a court to revoke the terms of a diversion. And , with that guilty plea already submitted, the defendant's conviction is a foregone conclusion.

A good criminal defense lawyer can help you negotiate with a prosecutor for a diversion. But as always, be careful about accepting a plea agreement if you are in fact innocent, and have the evidence to support your innocence.

Here again, sometimes it is just better to fight for your innocence in court. But To do this you need a good criminal lawyer [http://www.askcrimelawyer.blogspot.com] fight for you.

To be considered for diversion, the defendant, usually considered to be "returned" the prosecutor and judge. This means that does not belong to the individual as a criminal, but someone who can be corrected through counseling, restitution or other conditions of the diversion.

Generally, if the defendant>defense lawyer and the prosecutor agree on the terms of the diversion, the judge will agree. But not always. Sometimes a judge will refuse to sign off on a diversion because he or she wants to send a message and show the community that he or she is "tough on crime."

With harsher drunk driving laws on the books, a diversion may not be an option for driving under the influence in your state.

The key point that I cannot emphasize strongly enough, is to remember that you are under the microscope all the fun time, usually for one year. This means not only fully comply with all the details of your requirements must also be discharged to avoid further confronted with the law. In particular, alcohol or domestic accidents.

You have grown your lawyer

Image : http://www.flickr.com

How can you tell when you’ve outgrown your legal counsel? The following questions may help you decide if you need to make changes on your legal team.
There are basically two types of business lawyers, litigation lawyers and transactional lawyers. Litigation lawyers specialize in handling lawsuits and courtroom proceedings, while transactional lawyers handle contracts and other general business matters.
You’ll want to hire a litigation lawyer if you’re involved in a lawsuit or criminal proceeding. Otherwise, a transactional lawyer can probably handle all your business needs.

- What services do you feel you need that you aren’t getting now from your present legal counsel?

- Has the nature of your legal work changed recently where your current legal team can no longer meet the needs of your business?

- Has the volume of your legal work increased (or decreased) where you need a bigger (or smaller) team?

- Has the legal work become more complicated where it requires specialized knowledge or skills?

- Have you recently automated your systems and your current counsel is still doing things the old fashioned way?

- Does your current attorney seem overwhelmed with the amount of legal work you’re generating?

- Has the relationship broken down for personal reasons or a personality conflict?

- Do you feel that you’re not getting good value for your money? What areas do you have specific complaints about?

- Do you always have to chase staff down to try and get answers to your questions?

- Is your current attorney always late in getting paperwork and reports to you on time?

- Do the costs you’re being charged seem excessive?

- Is your current counsel short-staffed?

- Do you seem to spend a lot of time managing the legal staff and dealing with their problems?

- Is your current legal counsel too busy to take your calls?

Once you determine that a new legal team is the right decision for you, here are a few pointers for hiring the right attorney for your business:

- Look for a law firm that specializes in the expertise you’re looking for

- Ask for references from other clients

- Ask about potential conflicts of interest with other clients

- Set appropriate terms for the engagement

- Estimate engagement costs before deciding on hiring a specific firm

- Specify which lawyers you want assigned to your case, and pay only for those lawyers you pre-approve

- Require a full description of conferences between lawyers and the matters discussed

- Require that a designated partner review and sign-off on all invoices

- Designate who will take and review depositions

- How will photocopying be handled?

- Explain your budget for fees and costs beforehand

- Insist on periodic, timely billing

- Establish milestones for engagement and budget review

- Communicate your expectations clearly so there are no misunderstandings

- Establish a maximum fee for the engagement and stick to it

…and finally, be a good client! The relationship with your legal team should be a collaborative partnership. To ensure quality results, be sure that you are clearly communicating with your legal team. Don’t keep them in the dark about changes in your business strategy and tactics and do not communicate immediately if you have any questions or concerns about their work. Choosing a legal team is hard work, and worth cultivating relationships, when it is created.